Admittedly, I haven’t studied today’s Supreme Court opinion. As I understand it, the Court was silent on what sort of limitations a jurisdiction could put on gun ownership, but DID say that a full-on ban was unconstitutional. Seems pretty straight-forward.
This begs the question, “What limitations are reasonable?” I moved from a state with some of the strictest state gun laws in the country to one with the most lax. Illinois has mandatory Firearm Owner ID cards, registration, waiting periods, and tough carry laws. Tough, as in, you aren’t allowed to carry them at all. Virginia, on the other hand, has no registration, no ID cards, little to no waiting period, and I believe no background check. A single NRA safety class appears to be enough to qualify a non-criminal for a concealed carry license that is acknowledged in 24 other states.
I wonder, is this too light? We put people through significantly more rigorous tests for a drivers’ license. 16-year-olds must spend months proving their mental and technical qualifications before we trust them on the roads. Then again, driving is a privilege, while owning a weapon is a right (doubly reinforced by today’s ruling). Still, I think there should be a bit higher bar than some states require. Ultimately achievable, but proportional to the weight of the responsibility.
Erin and I have thought out purchasing a firearm, or at least going to the range and learning. The NRA is headquartered just down the Interstate, and teach the necessary intensive safety and firearm technique classes. Might as well learn from the best. I think I will attend two before applying for my concealed-carry license. Some of you may own a pistol or other firearm, so feel free to tell me what you have learned, and what you recommend.

